Tuesday, March 29, 2022


Image of baby from Shutterstock, James Barker.  Image of Bars, Nicholas Nanos. Images merged by Nicholas Nanos

A review of “Born A Crime”, by Trevor Noah.

The book explores Trevor Noah’s life’s journey. He documents his changes as he grows into a successful adult. The book highlights the culture created by the apartheid laws, and Trevor’s families perilous lives in the fear of the police taking Trevor away to an orphanage, jailing his mother and punishing his father. It tells how Trevor and his mother navigate these unjust laws and the violence caused by the environment they create.

This book requires an understanding of the laws of apartheid in South Africa which made interracial marriage a crime. Trevor, born of a Black woman and a white Swiss man is a crime. The story has three main thrusts. One, the brutality of apartheid. Two how he does not fit in. Three the strength and defiance Trevor and his mother show defying apartheid. He says apartheid laws divide and conquer non whites. 

The different languages of the various tribes and ethnicities are exploited creating conflict between them. When apartheid fell the African tribes went to war trying to form the new government. He tells a story about when his mother threw him out of a moving minibus. They were being threatened by a Zulu driver who wanted to kill them because his mother is Xhosa. When they slowed at an intersection, she threw Trevor from the moving van and then jumped wrapping his brother in her body, and they ran away. Her faith is so strong she gives up her insurance because Jesus is her insurance.  He writes “She was unwavering in the face of danger.”

Trevor writes about himself, a youth running from his mom escaping punishment, to a music bootlegger making enough money to survive. He doesn’t quite fit in with any tribe but speaks the languages of most, and because of that is tolerated by them. He makes them laugh, foreshadowing his comedy career.

Another foreshadowing near the beginning of the book is when the mechanic, who services their car, marries, abuses, and shoots his mother. The book tells a fascinating series of stories about what Trevor his mother and his friends lived through. His mother gives him inner strength, self confidence, and knowledge, teaching with tough love. He learns that language, not colour defines a tribe, and learning another’s language mitigates your outsider status.

The book explains his powerful sense of self worth that made him successful. The women in his life made him strong. He was raised believing the world was his oyster. He made most people laugh, spoke their languages, and was accepted.

The literary theory concept of the ‘death of the author’[1] applies here. My perception of him as just another very talented funny guy shifted to a man who is a bridge between people. He enables others to understand each other by becoming part of differing groups and helps them realise they have more in common than differences. He does this now through his comedy. I did not see this before.

Marxist literary theory applies as the white people have all the money and power. Trevor manages to over come these economic bonds and succeeds despite them. The theory also applies to the oppressed tribes. The economics of apartheid, create the conflict Trevor witnesses and experiences. The economics practiced by Trevor are capitalistic. The laws of apartheid are economically oppressive, and the oppressed are aware of that as they witness the white people’s affluence while working for a pittance.

The apartheid laws are a character in the story. The violence and ignorance they enforce is well illuminated in the book. The lack of economic opportunity is over come by his mother’s independent spirit when she becomes a secretary. She shows her independence by having Trevor and teaching him as if he were white. Marxist theory examines class struggles between economic cultures of rich and poor. This book moves the theory into the struggle between the ‘races’. The Zulu against the Xhosa, coloureds against blacks, and whites against everyone, etc.

Trevor becomes a productive society member, morphing from a troublemaker with more energy than normal, into a person who is both apart from the tribes but accepted because he speaks their language. He becomes an entrepreneur selling music to minibus drivers and others. But he doesn’t make enough money to save and improve himself. He lives and breaks rules that do not make sense. He found loopholes in every law he encountered and exploits them.

The book is so well written, I often wondered if he would survive.  I was so engrossed that having seen him on TV was temporarily banished from my mind. This book points out many important facts. The main ones are.

1.      Family is the most important thing you have.

2.      Racist ideas and racism are based on fallacy and is therefore nonsensical.

3.      Language, not race, defines the members of a culture or tribe.

4.      Laws and rules that are silly or stupid should be pointed out and broken to ensure they’re revoked.

5.      If you believe in yourself, you can overcome adversity and anyone who tries to hold you back.

6.      Faith in something, God, the Creator call it what you will is very important.

7.      Money is not everything. (He didn’t care what the cost for the hospital would be to save his mother).

 I'll leave you with this question from the book that stood out for me, “If Jesus walked into a Catholic Church, would they deny him communion because he is Jewish?”  

I’ll add another that the book does not ask, “If he is allowed, is that a form of cannibalism, and is that a valid reason for the denial of the sacrament?



[1] The death of the author refers to a change in attitude toward the role of author by the reader. From the book Critical theory today A user-friendly guide by Lois Tyson

 

 

Friday, March 29, 2013

Myths and Religious Tradition


This is a comment on how we use and view mythology within two different faith groups I belong to.
Jordan Peterson and Joseph Campbell both state that myths give us the ability to cope when we need to rebuild our world view in a psychological crisis. They say that our society is sick due to a lack of myths. When you live within the structure of a myth, that myth will be absorbed by your psyche. The myth sinks into your bones.  

The advantage of this is that a psyche that obtains a myth’s architecture has the strength and resilience that is required to not just deal with but also benefit from the lessons given when the chaos of disaster enters a life. This is one of the great advantages of the Christian Church. But, it will only become a strength if the story is recognized as myth and not taken as historical fact.

Taking a myth as a literal truth robs it of the very truth it contains. There are many people who think that myths are simple, enjoyable and entertaining tales that have no truth in them. After all, modern science has disproven many things told in myths. This thing that supposedly happened according to the myth could not have happened therefore there is no truth to the myth.

So these people deny the validity or simply will not search for the mythological truths because they cannot measure them, nor can they feel their value. Joseph Campbell said in an interview that all cultures have the same myths: resurrection stories for example. The question he tried to answer was why this is so. Both Joseph Campbell and Jordan Peterson state that mythological architectures aid us in reconstructing our world view when it is destroyed.

Yet people who deny the truth in a myth will tell Aesop’s fables and other stories of like kind and point to the conclusion and say that the story has real merit because the lesson it gives is important. The fact that animals cannot talk, but do so in these stories, doesn't matter; after all it isn't meant to be taken literally.
But that is my point; myths are not to be taken literally. 

The various archetypal heroes of the myths are mangled, tortured, abused or killed, and yet they come out victorious, despite everything that happens to them. This resurrection is the very architecture taken into our subconscious that helps keep us sane when disaster strikes. Myths sink into our being and give us strength when we most need it. It also helps us learn from the painful experiences we have. We can step back and build a new world view and learn from the experience in such a way that the myth becomes richer and stronger within us.

I belong to two different faith groups. The first group is the Anglican Church as it lives within St. Simon-the-Apostle church on Bloor Street in Toronto Ontario Canada. The second faith group is on Hiawatha Street also in Toronto and is Neighbourhood Unitarian Universalist Congregation.  In St. Simon’s we have been lucky to have had some Priests who view the Bible as Mythos.

Few Priests, who served there, thought of the stories of the Bible as historical fact. The trap of “here is the myth and it is like all the other myths, but ours really happened” is fortunately avoided in St. Simons. You are expected to say the creed, and weekly imbibe the mythos. There is however nothing that says you are required to believe the dogma as historical fact. 

The dogma of the Church supports and comes from the myth and is supposed to be taken as Truth. It is the dogmatic approach that causes trouble when science collides with Myth. Fortunately St. Simon’s does not take this approach.

Neighbourhood Unitarian Universalist Congregation (Neighbourhood) however is completely dogma free. This means the belief system does not collide with science in the same way as in the Anglican Church. You are not required to believe in anything specific. You are told that your spiritual growth is your own responsibility. To be a Unitarian Universalist you are required to follow the seven principles which are:
“We the member congregations of the Unitarian Universalist Association covenant too affirm and promote:
        The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
        Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
       Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual
        growth in our congregations;
       A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
       The right of conscience and the use of the democratic 
       process within our congregations and in society at large;
       The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and
       justice for all;
       Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which
       we are a part.”

If you do not follow the seven principles you are not a Unitarian Universalist. Unitarian Universal-ism (UU) draws from many mythological sources. No valid myth is deemed more or less important than another. The strength of this approach is that all valid teachings, myths, poetry, stories and writings of great teachers and an incredible diversity of music and thought are used in UU communities.

The weakness is that while Neighbourhood is one of the most spiritual places I have ever been, there is no mythological architecture that I can imbibe to guide my living and strengthen me when chaos overtakes my life. In fact if the Minister is not very spiritual a UU community it is not likely to be very spiritual either. I have worked in some UU communities where the services resembled university lectures with music thrown in to alleviate the talk. These communities were spiritually dry. I also work in a UU community so spiritual that I am strengthened and often deeply moved every time I go to a service.  

Now the fact that the mythological structure within the Anglican Church is common does not mean that these churches are all the same in their spiritual feeling. The story is the same, but the way the myth is told and interpreted varies greatly within Anglican Churches. Better understanding of the language in the ancient texts has actually given the Anglican Church a problem.

Early interpretation of what God wants was not universal. The early Church and the Jews before them followed what Joseph Campbell calls a bounded myth. This Truth is for us. It is not for them, they are not us, so therefore we are better. Because of the bounded nature of the myth we have scripture that is extremely contradictory. “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.” as sung by angels in Luke 2:14, is more accurately translated as “Glory to God in highest heaven, and peace on earth to those with whom God is pleased.” So now we have to decide who God is pleased with. The bounded Myth makes us against them. After all He must be pleased with us, we’re the good guys.

The UU attitude that mythology should be for everyone equally with no one myth being more important than another is a very good idea. The strength here becomes a weakness though because there is not one underlying story that everyone can enact throughout the year and get into their bones. The Anglicans, Catholics, Orthodox, and other Christian denominations would be better served if the Bible were first translated literally, then the text handed to good poets. These poets would tell the story with all the power of beautiful language. Have the theological experts check the result ensuring the bounded nature of the original is removed. After much handing back and forth we would have a Bible that has the power of poetic language and the Truth of the mythical, mystical tales it tells. I think that by unbinding the mythos of the Church, it would be more acceptable to everyone.

UUs use multiple mythologies. We can learn from them all and that is a great. But we as UUs choose for a service one mythology, and the teaching surrounding it, then move to another myth and then the week after that another. The under lying power of the myths presented are not lived. It would be better for the community to live the mythology for a time before moving to the next great teaching. Give the Truth of the myth a chance to sink into the bones of the congregation and be actually understood by trying to live it for a time. Have the community learn and feel how that chosen myth directs the seven principles and supports the actions of those faith statements. It might even make it easier for the UU community to live by the seven principles day to day.

There is a balance in the strength and weaknesses found in both traditions. The weakness of the UU approach is that there is no one underlying myth to learn and absorb. The strength is the exposure of the community to many myths and the commonality they share. The weakness of the Anglican Church is the Church’s history that makes myth into dogma that must be followed. This makes people, and some Priests, act as if the story of the Bible were history and not Myth. Doing that defeats the Myth and hides its Truth.


Friday, August 6, 2010

We cannot do what we want.

I was struck by the fact that one Minister would vehemently contradict another in a service. It was only after reflecting on the talk that it became clear to me the vehemence was justified. There is a common misconception that Unitarians can believe whatever they wish and that ‘anything goes’. This is due to the acceptance that Unitarians have that there is Truth and wisdome to be found in all spiritual paths. There is indeed great truths in all the major religions. From all the great religions Unitarians take the wisdom and Truths found in their scripture and their teachings. However the Minister pointed out that unless the teachings and the path taken are in harmony with the Unitarian seven principles then they cannot be followed and are not Unitarian valid so to speak. The principles are:

• The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
• Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
• Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our
congregations;
• A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
• The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our
congregations and in society at large;
• The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;
• Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.

The point is that fundamentalists who proport to follow one of the great religions cannot be called Christian or Jew or Muslim or whatever because they violate the tenets of their own faith. Neither can they be considered Unitarian bcause they do not meet any of the priciples Unitarians try to live by. Unitarian cannot “do whatever they want,” but they can follow any path they wish providing they attempt to adhere to the seven principles.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Meditation

During a recient meditation the leader stated that we often have many thoughts few of which are actually deep and that the same is true of emotions. It is not that other’s are smarter or brighter than us because the ability to have real depth of thoughts and feelings is what makes us human. I know what he means sort of. The committee is always rehearsing or rehashing what to do or what has been done. And the full brain supresses the awareness of feelings, which are a body not a head thing. By stilling the mind we can eventually achieve a real deep feeling. Eventually we even get below the feelings to an awareness of life that is impossible to describe but whish is filled with real joy. I have been lucky to have reached that once. It is what keeps me trying to meditate. I would like to know why it is easier to meditate with others than alone however. Maybe one day I will find that out.

Friday, February 5, 2010

New Age

Recently at a spiritual cinema we watched a film from one of the new age gurus. The film was ok and the message was that we do not need the same spiritual directions in later years as we do in our youth. No argument there. One person who I respect as a spiritual leader has problems with the “New Age” books, lectures, films etc. After the after film chat I thought about what he had to say trying to make what was said easier to understand and assimilate it. Essentially the problem with the new age stuff is it simplifies the complex too much. While there is truth at the core of the arguments the main flaw is that it tends to be formulistic. If you do this then you will be happy. While the various things the movement says you should do will make you happier, there is still the chaos that life can give you. One film I found sufficiently annoying to actually comment on much to the dismay of some of the films supporters said, if we eat healthy we will be healthy. Removing the toxins from our food would help us live longer more fulfilled lives. I agree removing toxins from the food we eat is important. I also think eating better reduces illness. Now there are diseases that are inherited, and eating well will not prevent them. Some diseases are more a result of the overall environment than what we eat. Does that mean the ill person did not eat well and should be blamed for the disease they ‘caught’. Some types of flu strike people who are very health conscious and who make a point of living well, eating wholesome foods, and exercise regularly. It is as if this disease targets the very people who are working hard to be healthy. The problem with the generalization of and formalistic approach of the new age is that life is chaotic, and bad stuff happens to good people without them looking for trouble. The formula of just do this and all will be well is nonsensical. The underlying truth in the New Age movement should not be ignored, but then neither should life.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Free Will?

I believe, and many priests, ministers, rabbis and imams have told me, that we are given free will by God. Ted Scott former Primate of the Anglican church in a conversation with me once said that God made the rules and free will was one of them. God will not interfere in what people do bad or good because that would be breaking his rule of free will. Now all of these religious leaders also say, and there is scientific proof of this as well, that prayer works. And this makes me wonder about what “prayer works” means. Not in the effectiveness of prayer but in the implication the impact God answering prayer has on free will. If God or the Creator answerers prayer then S/He is interfeering and fere will is compromised. I once heard an old Cree medicine man tell a physician that “people are not machines, when the body is hurt by disease the soul is also, by neglecting to heal the soul modern medicine does only part of the job.” The physician eventually came to agree. The argument was about what purpose if any the drumming and chanting had when healig the sick. In an earlier blog i stated that prayer was directed energy. I think also that the soul, which is the imortal part of our being, is energy and linked directly to everything in the universe. Now I also stated that when we pray we direct the healing thoughts and energies to the ones we are praying for. Prayer works in my opinion because we direct some of our health to others who need it. It does not work, in fact I believe cannot work because of the rule of non interference giving us free will, because the Almighty Creator heals. It is fairly well known that the attitude of the sick person is as much a factor in the recuperative process as the medicines they are given. Knowing someone cares enough to light a candle for you or to pray is often a boost we need to feel better within ourselves. I think that the prayers of others, no matter what form they take, help us heal both by giving us much neaded healing energy and by making us feel more of our own self worth. Knowing you are loved is as important as the pill the doctor gave you.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

More on Five Elements

In my previous entry I talked about the five aspects of some spiritual paths and how in some ways people are like the five elements. The ending was unclear in my mind and required further comment so here goes. We are all thought, cognition and ideas. What we think is a huge part of us. We all feel emotion, fear, anger, joy and love. In my opinion our spirit, lives below the emotions and thought. It is our motivator, the over all love and awe we feel at being alive. The true appreciation of the creation around us its beauty and terror shapes our spirit. The awe at the beauty of nature like a sunset or a rainbow forms our spirit. Our underlying belief in justice, freedom and what is right and wrong are from all three parts of us as human beings. The foundation of how we act this reality is our spirit. But w are more than this physical being. We’re connected to the greater whole in some inexplicable way. Our soul is that part which connects us to the universe around us. It is where we came from and where we go to. This part of us is larger than us and yet defines our boundaries. It is the most difficult part of us for us to understand. Our spirit emotions and thought make us act and our soul reflects back the ripples in the universe our acts make. Our soul links us to creation is an incomprehensible way. Difficult to grasp though this is the fifth element is more so. This is to goal of all spiritual paths. A perfect balance of all the elements we are. Perfect understanding of all the fours aspects of what we are and making them balanced into something whole. Total awareness of what we are and do. This makes eternity now present and complete. The fifth element is often referred to as the temple or the circle or a unity being or the holy. Such true self knowing is very difficult. Balancing the awareness of what we think feel and the underlying motivation with the understanding of how we are all connected to creation and each other, is very difficult. I have seen some people obtain glimpses of this. They were all remarkable people and fit many spiritual paths. They were Christians, Buddhists, Jews and Muslims. They all said prayer or meditation was the main thing that enabled them to touch briefly that unknown we call God. And this fleeting touch of enlightenment helped them become better people helping others. So it doesn’t matter what the path you prefer as long as you attempt the journey.
Namaste

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

We Are Five

It has struck me that in many spiritual paths there are five elements. They are usually earth, fire, air, water, and spirit with spirit being the unity of the other four. I find that people seem to be four elements combined into a whole so this might be the reason for this mythological spiritual construct. People are physical, and energy, it’s how we move our muscle folks. Also we are mental or thinking beings and we have a soul, whatever that is. I tend lately to think that our emotional being is our spirit. All together this makes the soul that we are. The main problem we have spiritually is that we think too much. Our mental state combined with our physical bodies dominates our world. We all know there is more to us than that and that it requires our attention. I think that our thinking about food, and what we’ll do for fun, when do we get paid, does the laundry need doing, etc. all dominate our lives so much that we neglect what we truly are. It is this neglect that makes us unhappy. We are all souls. We are all united together in the greater universe. I personally think our soul outlasts this lifetime. Our thoughts crowd out what we feel because the brain is too busy to know to process what we really feel. I find that by meditating I do get to know what I am feeling more accurately. This is not always comfortable but it does help me grow. Lately I am trying to figure out why I react a certain way. Is it because I am afraid of something? I do not yet know but I will meditate and let what comes, come. Who knows, I may actually find out in the stillness of my mind. Stillness of my mind, oh if only… my committee in my head seems to want overtime.
I have found that if I make the meditation a ritual it is more effective. I think this is because the repetitive actions for setup and the candles being lit help the mind and body realizes what I am going to attempt to do. It also makes the symbols of the elements more present in my awareness. Who knows maybe one day I to will become enlightened. At least for now I become more aware of what is around me and more aware of what I feel about things. It is funny how unexpected emotions arise during a meditation. I find dealing with them by recognizing them and then letting them go so they have less control over my actions is very helpful to me being a better person. I truly believe only I can make me a better person. This is frightening and liberating at the same time. So balancing all four aspects of what I am is both very hard and very rewarding.

Namaste

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Personal Comparison

I find it very interesting that the two churches where I am involved are so different. The first church where I sing and get paid is an Anglican church. They play politics, gripe, many are homophobic, and unless you have been there for a long while you are not ‘one of the club’. It is a sad place, because there can be and is a lot of good there. They, unfortunately, undermine and bitch about everything, which makes it a very difficult place. The other place is one of the most caring and accepting places and communities. They welcome everyone and not only tolerate but encourage differences. They thrive off one another. It was singing in the patronal feast at the first church that made me realise what disturbed me most about the Anglican Church in general, not specifically this one but in general. It is a dictatorship, and while dictatorships are very efficient they are only as tolerant and good as the dictator. When Ted Scott was Primate the Anglican Church of Canada was definitely a much better place than it had been in the past and is now. Individual churches are the same if the priest is mediocre then the parish is either led unofficially by a parishioner or it becomes mediocre. The other church is Unitarian and the autonomy each church has means every church has its own personality. I have yet to be in a mediocre Unitarian church. The point I am making is that when a bishop of the church is a bible thumper and thinks it is not myth then you get institutional intolerance. None of the Unitarian ministers I have met are bible thumpers. Openness to other paths and the encouragement to follow them instead of some dogmatic faith in something that is usually not explained properly, if at all is a Unitarian tradition. Now I have not yet been to many Unitarian congregations nor have I talked with many of the Unitarian ministers. The few I have met and interacted with are unusually open, caring and intelligent people. I think the effectiveness they have is due to the lack of restriction dogma places on them. The nature of the Unitarian Church seems to force them to consider other ideas and approaches to the ‘Great Unknown’. History will preclude the Anglican and other denominational churches from being so open and avoid the dogmatic trap. The challenge they must face is the need to rise above the dogma and, like Ted Scott, tread a more tolerant road.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Seeking

When we seek, even when we seek the thing we do not know or understand, even when we know deep down we can never know, we change. When we change we seek even more. Over time a limited understanding of what we are, our Self, and our place in creation begins to emerge. The real problem with life long learning is that “We do not know what we don’t know.” but this doesn’t make life long learning meaningless. What to learn next when we’re not sure what we are learning is difficult but it is good. Dealing with life within our limitations, despite how wonderful that limited being is, and trying to comprehend what we are is a real struggle. But denying the struggle and sinking into complacency is also to deny ourselves. More it is to deny the creator. We are a part of the creator and as such we need to grow in understanding. So look deeply as possible within. Meditate and learn that we are all, truly wonderful, holy and unique beings.